On Fallout 4: My Article in The Times of India
So here's my take of Fallout 4 from my column in the Times of India. The title is the handiwork of my friend and editor Subhayu Mazumder and I like it a lot. There is, of course, a lot more that I could have said about the choice mechanisms and the context of the videogame. In response to some of the comments I received on my statement that the game involves the player making choices that shape his/her identity in the game, I have a few points to add:
Returning to the choice issue, when we see it in terms of formal gameplay construction, you have a point. However, the game is premised on a typical branching of ethical positions - almost too clear-cut although you could move back-and-forth a bit. So if you stick to the mission sequences (I don't), it boils down to Army / Government, Academia / Science , Resistance / Left-wing and Citizens / Commonwealth. Of course, you can't play as a super-mutant or a ghoul or a synth although you can have people of these 'races' / social groups as your partner. Nevertheless, making decisions like having to fight the son you were seeking (or not) are difficult ones. Absalom, Absalom! methinks. Likewise, the decision to side with any faction is one of taking a moral position and at the same time accepting the constraints of gameplay associated with this.Anyway, after starting in medias res, here's my article:
2277: An Apocalyptic Odyssey
War never changes. A previous article in this column had
reviewed Fallout 3 and promised a
further visit to the war-ravaged post-apocalyptic America that is featured in
the series. In Fallout 4, we are in Boston, known as the Commonwealth in 2277,
where the few survivors of nuclear war have set up their homes in what remains
of the once famous metropolis – some now live inside a former baseball stadium
and others live in scattered settlements that grow irradiated crops and are
constantly under threat from raiders, supermutants and animals that live in the
wasteland around them. Besides these, there are ghouls, described as ‘necrotic
posthumans’ by the Fallout wiki, the
reminders of what excessive radiation can do to humans. Some of them have lost
their abilities to reason and turned ‘feral’ or zombie-like. Besides the usual
denizens of the Fallout world Fallout 4 is a fitting sequel to the
former games and the journey from the Capital Wasteland (erstwhile Washington)
and New Vegas seems another worthwhile venture in reflecting on the horrors of
what nuclear war can do while having another go at saving humankind in this
alternate-reality universe.
The Commonwealth is a huge world to explore and can easily
provide over a week’s gameplay if not more, depending on which faction you join
and what you do in the game. The Karma system from the earlier game is missing
although your companions change their attitude towards you depending on how you
act. The factions in the game have obvious intended present-day parallels. The
Brotherhood of Steel is what remains of the army and they return from the
earlier games with their crusade against the misuse of technology and their
goal of establishing peace among humanity. Woven into their plans, however, is
their clear rhetoric of racial cleansing – mutants, ghouls, androids and indeed
anyone who is ‘other’ than ‘human’ needs to be eliminated. They possess
state-of-art pre-apocalypse military technology including a giant robot called
Liberty Prime, which destroys everything in its path while alternately spewing
anti-communist slogans and lines from Robert Frost. Opposed to them is the
Institute, whose resemblance to MIT is easy to spot (it is located underneath
the Commonwealth Institute of Technology) and who are committed to improving
the world by building ‘synths’ or synthetic humans. Despite their purportedly
glorious aims, they are a terror to the Commonwealth residents and their synths
are often used against humans rather than to aid them. Among the other
factions, the most prominent are the Minutemen, so named after their historical
antecedents who fought against the British in the American War of Independence
and whose stories, like the poetry of Frost, are deeply connected with the
local lore of New England, where the game is set.
As with its predecessors, Fallout 4 is not just about playing a shooter game - it is also about who you are and wish to
be. A web of moral choices determines your path towards the many possible
endings and some of them are fairly difficult to make. For example, when you
find out that the Director of the Institute is none other than your son whom
you have been looking for since the game started. Or when you realise that the
easiest and quickest way to finish the game is to side with the Brotherhood of
Steel and ‘save’ the world from their problematic perspective and racial
agenda. Also, personally speaking, having to witness a nuclear explosion
conducted for the ‘noble’ cause of destroying the Institute was less than
comfortable.
This does not mean any less of the usual though – boss
fights are as challenging and the player will have a hard time fighting the
legendary Deathclaw, the Mirelurk Queen
or the Legendary Sentinel Robot. The game also allows you to craft your own
weapons and build settlements so if you see junk around you in your many
travels, be sure to pick it up for future use. The missions around protecting
the settlements tend to get repetitive after a time. Other than that the heavy
system requirements (needs high-end graphic cards on PCs and does not play on
the older consoles such as PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360) and the high price for
all the platforms will surely dampen the enthusiasm of many Indian gamers. All
said though, a trip to the Commonwealth is not to be missed - the system upgrade that you had been putting
off and the wait until prices come down, notwithstanding.
Rating: 5 out of 5.
Genre: First / third-person shooter,
role-playing game (RPG), open-world game
Platforms: PC, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One.
An Encounter with Tipoo’s Tiger: A Post-colonial Toy
Tipu Sultan or ‘The Tipoo’, who was the cause of much worry for the East India Company and was defeated in the famous Siege of Seringapatnam, where Arthur Wellesley (later the Duke of Wellington) was one of the commanders, is now a controversial figure in India. When I was a kid, the Indian national TV channel showed a multi-part TV-series called the Sword of Tipu Sultan that portrayed the Sultan as a national hero who fought the evils of colonialism and was a popular ruler among his subjects, both Hindu and Muslim.
The Last Effort and Fall of Tippoo Sultan by Henry Singleton
It was here that I learnt that ‘the Tippoo’, as the British called him, had taken the title of the ‘Tiger of Mysore’. The French called him Citoyen Tipu and the new Republic (and later Napoleon) were allies in his battles with the British. For the British, Tippoo Sahib was a formidable enemy and the London papers often voiced panic about the potential dangers of a liaison between Napoleon and the Tipu. Until his defeat in 1799, Tipu had formed alliances with and against the neighbouring kingdoms, both Hindu and Muslim, to fight the British. He was accused of barbarism by the British and is now claimed by some as the champion of Islam. Bernard Cornwell’s hero, Richard Sharpe, is depicted as killing the barbaric and pudgy Tipu Sultan and then looting his treasures. Wilkie Collins’s The Moonstone is about a cursed gem that was part of the British loot after Tipu’s fort fell. The looting of Seringapatnam resulted in the East India Company gaining around a billion pounds in today’s currency and as historian Maya Jasanoff comments, the plunder and rape that followed exceeded imagination. To view Tipu a supporter of radical Islam too does not sit very easily as while he carried out forced conversions of Hindus, he also endowed Hindu temples and employed Hindus among his chief courtiers. While his politics and his religious bent are clearly more complex than they are made out to be, what is quite undoubtedly evident is his legacy in British colonial memory as the dangerous ‘other’ of colonialism.
Tipu’s toy tiger, described as ‘man-tyger-organ’ by the poet John Keats who portrayed it as the plaything of an Eastern despot, was one of the first objects exported from India to England for public display. While Tipu’s swords, books and jewels ended up with private collectors (including Sir Walter Scott), the toy Tiger was exhibited at the East India Museum. As Jonathan Jones writes in his article in the Guardian:
The most famous exhibit was the most macabre. It is still the most popular Indian artefact in London, and the very quintessence of a “curiosity". In 1814 a young woman from the provinces visited London. She went to the museum at East India House, one of the capital's attractions. There she shuddered to hear a dreadful moan, as of a man dying. She came face to face with a painted wooden tiger in the act of devouring its white-faced, red-coated victim. As the curator worked it, she had to be escorted from the museum "pale and trembling".
This toy that the frightened woman must have encountered is described in the V & A website as a life-size 18th century semi-automaton of a tiger devouring a prostrate British soldier. The website goes on to describe the Tiger thus:
Concealed in the bodywork is a mechanical pipe-organ with several parts, all operated simultaneously by a crank-handle emerging from the tiger's shoulder. Inside the tiger and the man are weighted bellows with pipes attached. Turning the handle pumps the bellows and controls the air-flow to simulate the growls of the tiger and cries of the victim. The cries are varied by the approach of the hand towards the mouth and away, as the left arm - the only moving part - is raised and lowered. […] Another pair of bellows, linked to the same handle, supplies wind for a miniature organ of 18 pipes built into the tiger, with stops under the tail. Its structure is like that of European mechanical organs, but adapted for hand operation by a set of ivory button keys reached through a flap in the animal's side. The mechanism has been repaired several times and altered from its original state. It is now too fragile to be operated regularly.
The exhibition of the Tiger, argue historians, was more a matter of propaganda for the Company - making it a symbol of power over subject nations that would replace its earlier image of a trader in indigo and spices. The Seringapatna Medal, to commemorate the victory, was cast in the image of Tipu's Tiger - only this time, the British lion is rampant over the tiger. If Tipu had ever played with the idea of a triumph over British imperialism was, the story now was reversed and only his toy tiger remains one of the few symbols of his political ambitions. The toy contains a further level of complexity: the wooden tiger might have been crafted in India but the mechanism inside is French. Then again, the exhibition of the tiger in the East India Museum (and later as the prize object of the V & A) must have been absolutely fundamental to the metaphorical establishment of victory over both of these threats to the Honourable Company: the combined bogeys of Napoleon and Tippoo Sahib.
The Tiger, however, seems to have fought back for centuries. Now placed among thousands of extremely valuable objects brought to Britain from its former colonial possessions, the Tiger rampant on a British soldier still challenges the ideal of British colonialism and fragile as its condition may be, the appeal of winding up the automaton is much too strong still. The video, above, of the V & A staff shows the toy in action. In a country where much of the tiger population now graces the colonial trophy rooms and where entire jungles have been replaced by a colonial apparatus of human settlements, the toy tiger, nevertheless, embodies the dangers faced by the colonial mechanism. Tigers are dangerous creatures after all and Tipu’s Tiger is modelled on a real-life incident - the death of a Lieutenant Hugh Munro who had gone out shooting in the forests of Bengal. The young Munro was the son of the hero of Buxar, Sir Hector Munro. The victory at Buxar brought almost the whole of North India under the Company’s rule. Sir Hector was, however, defeated by Tipu’s father, Hyder Ali, and in Tipu’s toy tiger, the unfortunate death of Munrow junior was used as a metaphor for a possible reconquering of lands and the expulsion of a foreign power. One crucial detail about the tiger, however, remains unknown: whether Tipu himself ever played with the tiger is not mentioned by the historians and how important it might have ever been to him is not clear. To me, therefore, what gives the tiger its unique role as a post-colonial toy is, ironically, the status accorded to it in British India and in England even today.
The Tipu's iTiger app is available for iPhone and iPod Touch
Most people in India, even the many who revere the complex and controversial Sultan as a national hero, do not know about the toy tiger and they certainly haven't seen it in its home in faraway London. As a toy, its appeal is that it allows us to play with an alternate reality to that of British colonialism. I suspect that same appeal could not have escaped the would-be colonial masters of India when they brought it over to London. For them, here was a powerful emblem of anti-British sentiment to be played against itself. However, the tiger itself remains - a constant replaying of an alternate history to colonialism. In fact, even for the Company, despite its attempt to 'replay' as their symbol of victory, the toy tiger was a dangerous plaything - Lord Wellesley is said to have wanted it locked up the Tower of London. From John Keats to Richard Sharpe, iconic Britishers, whether real or fictional, highbrow or otherwise, have stood in awe of the tiger-toy. In fact, even the experts who demonstrate how to use the tiny organ inside the tiger seem to need to impress on us its colonial predicament: at the end of the video (see above) you hear them playing 'Rule Britannia'! *
Indeed, it is because of this colonial obsession with the tiger that I am intrigued by it. There have been many copies of the tiger-toy - a ceramic version (called The Death of Munrow) can be found in the V & A itself. The many copies and inversions of the tiger image symbolise for me the colonial power’s struggle to come to grips with its ‘other’ possible alternate realities and meanwhile, the original remains where it is - both a disturbing reminder of colonialism and a threat. That dangerous supplement - moved outside the borders of the Indian empire but into the heart of colonial London.
Indeed, it is because of this colonial obsession with the tiger that I am intrigued by it. There have been many copies of the tiger-toy - a ceramic version (called The Death of Munrow) can be found in the V & A itself. The many copies and inversions of the tiger image symbolise for me the colonial power’s struggle to come to grips with its ‘other’ possible alternate realities and meanwhile, the original remains where it is - both a disturbing reminder of colonialism and a threat. That dangerous supplement - moved outside the borders of the Indian empire but into the heart of colonial London.
Death of Munrow and its many iterations (Source: Google Image search)
——————
For those who are interested, Susan Stronge’s authoritative book, Tipu’s Tigers, is available on Amazon Prime. Richard Davis in his Lives of Indian Images describes how the choice of the tiger image would have resonated well with both Hindus (whose gods have tigers as their vahanas or ‘vehicles’) and Muslims. He also discusses other important aspects of the tiger image in Tipu’s court. Maya Jasanoff’s Edge of Empire: Lives, Culture, and Conquest in the East, 1750-1850 contains a detailed discussion of Tipu’s Tiger and the aftermath of the siege of Seringapatna. Jonathan James article in The Guardian can be found here: http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2003/sep/25/heritage.art and there are a couple more interesting blog posts on the Tiger that I found online.
* I am grateful to Dr Amrita Sen for having pointed out the 'Rule Britannia' part.
My Book Is Out at Last!
After action report
,
agency
,
Becoming
,
Bergson
,
Boal
,
Death
,
Deleuze
,
Magic Circle
,
monograph
,
Slider
,
Spinoza
,
storytelling
,
technicity
,
Time
,
Total War
,
walkthroughs
,
Wastelands
No comments
As some of you know already, my book Videogames and Storytelling: Reading Games and Playing Books was published in September 2015 by Palgrave Macmillan. Here is the blurb from the publisher’s website:
Grand Theft Auto IV saw more copies being sold than the latest superhero blockbusters or the last Harry Potter novel. Most of its players and critics commend its storytelling experience; however, when it comes to academic analysis, mainstream humanities research seems confused about what to do with such a phenomena. The problem is one of classification, in the first instance: 'is it a story, is it a game, or is it a machine?' Consequently, it also becomes a problem of methodology – which traditional discipline, if any, should lay claim to video game studies becoming the moot question. After weathering many controversies with regards to their cultural status, video games are now widely accepted as a new textual form that requires its own media-specific analysis. Despite the rapid rise in research and academic recognition, video game studies has seldom attempted to connect with older media and to locate itself within broader substantive discourses of the earlier and more established disciplines, especially those in the humanities. Video Games and Storytelling aims to readdress this gap and to bring video games to mainstream humanities research and teaching. In the process, it is also a rethinking story versus game debate as well as other key issues in game studies such as time, agency, involvement and textuality in video game-narratives.
(For more info, such as the Table of Contents and ordering, see the publisher's website: http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/Video-Games-and-Storytelling/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781137525048)
For those inclined towards electronic editions, a Kindle version is also available now. Here’s the link: http://www.amazon.com/Video-Games-Storytelling-Reading-Playing-ebook/dp/B017DQ7J3E/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1/276-1064401-1083624
What I don’t say in the blurb but feel I should here is that the book comes with a few warnings. There’s quite a bit of Deleuze in there (as there has been and will be in my work) and there’s my obsession with the now extinct THQ Studio’s hallmark game series STALKER. Predictably, of course, there’s Tarkovsky, Lewis Carroll and PKD rubbing shoulders inside discussions on videogames. My interest in paratexts and walkthroughs takes the form of a chapter-length discussion and of course, time, agency and involvement (called ‘immersion’ by some) figure importantly in what I have to say. Finally, I end with a discussion of eggs and which end to break them on. Ludology vs. Narratology has turned into the egg-endian debate that the Lilliputs in Gulliver’s Travels consider so sacrosanct.
Here's the email address for those wishing to request a review copy: reviews@palgrave.com
Finally, I love the book cover. Thanks especially to Palgrave Macmillan for all their help and patience.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment